Moore's law works, but not the law about efficient coding in the consumer area

Posted as an anonymous reply on slashdot

A major reason why users do not perceive performance advantages, is, that they now use a web browser almost all the time, and most people do so without adblockers, and without NoScript (in Firefox), or some other ad/scriptblocker elsewhere, such as uBlock Origin, or uMatrix (to each their own).



These tools are some of the most basic ways of optimising resource usage in a browser, and go a long way in making websites and browsers more reponsive, thereby improving speed and user experience.



Alas, most people don't have that, and advertisers are reaping great benefits thereof.



On top of that, there's the transformation of simple web pages into resource-heavy webapps. There used to be a time, when I could still use Firefox 1.0 on an older computer without having to worry too much about not getting a connection to where needed, since many sites were carefully designed to match the relatively basic abilities of their target audience. Anything fancier used Flash. But that was when desktops and notebooks were not particularly powerful as a class.



Now, though, a newer browser is a must both due to security implications, and because of video providers using newer codecs in order to increase video resolution size (4K and up), and to simultaneously seek to have a lesser load on the network in the face of more and more users gradually getting to see all that fancy 4K video on their 4K screens. Soon-to-be 8K. While most simply contend with 1080p as some sort of a standard.



Security is also a thing, and a faster rig or farm is able to break ciphers faster, too. A major gaming rig with several cores has the power comparable to any supercomputer of the days of yore, but is not necessarily faster in terms of user experience, because the software is awful (Windows 10), or a badly-coded website with terrible fonts and CSS, or a site that mines coins without the user noticing, but then complaining, that 'their computer is slow.'



Or simply lots of sites without being active on several tabs at any one time, without the browser having adblockers on. Firefox mostly has a remedy for that, and I think, Google Chrome -- despite its awful recent flaws -- is coming up (or has come up) with a suspend feature for inactive tabs.